Partnered Project Performance At The City Of Phoenix

Eric M. McFadden; James J. Ernzen

Partnered Project Performance At The City Of Phoenix

Eric M. McFadden
, James J. Ernzen

Construction, Del E. Webb School of

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The benefits,limitations and drawbacks of partnering versus not partnering public construction projects in US are discussed. Partnering allows design and construction teams to synergize as a teamtohance verallproject quality and timely completion. According to the data analyzed, partnered projects out-performed non-partnered projects in cost growth in the $0 to$5 million range only.The partnering process had a positive effect in minimizing liquidated damages.Non-partnered projects had fewer number of tasksthan partnered projects which could be attributed to the increased efforts by the contractor on the partnered projects to find mutually agreeale solutions.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Construction Research Cogress, Winds of Change
Subtitle of host publication	Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress
Editors	K.R. Molenaar, P.S. Chinowsky
Pages	741-749
Number of pages	9
State	Published - Dec 1 2003
Event	Construction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress - Honolulu, HI., United States Duration: Mar 19 2003 → Mar 21 2003

Publication series

Name	Contruction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress

Other

Other	Construction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress
Country/Territory	United States
City	Honolulu, HI.
Period	3/19/03 → 3/21/03

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Civil and Structural Engineering
Building and Construction
General Engineering

Cite this

McFadden, E. M., & Ernzen, J. J. (2003). Partnered Project Performance At The City Of Phoenix. In K. R. Molenaar, & P. S. Chinowsky (Eds.), Construction Research Cogress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress (pp. 741-749). (Contruction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress).

Partnered Project Performance At The City Of Phoenix. / McFadden, Eric M.; Ernzen, James J.
Construction Research Cogress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress. ed. / K.R. Molenaar; P.S. Chinowsky. 2003. p. 741-749 (Contruction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

McFadden, EM & Ernzen, JJ 2003, Partnered Project Performance At The City Of Phoenix. in KR Molenaar & PS Chinowsky (eds), Construction Research Cogress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress. Contruction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress, pp. 741-749, Construction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress, Honolulu, HI., United States, 3/19/03.

McFadden EM, Ernzen JJ. Partnered Project Performance At The City Of Phoenix. In Molenaar KR, Chinowsky PS, editors, Construction Research Cogress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress. 2003. p. 741-749. (Contruction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress).

McFadden, Eric M. ; Ernzen, James J. / Partnered Project Performance At The City Of Phoenix. Construction Research Cogress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress. editor / K.R. Molenaar ; P.S. Chinowsky. 2003. pp. 741-749 (Contruction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress).

@inproceedings{40b6beb9ee7c41159f8214d17020a195,

title = "Partnered Project Performance At The City Of Phoenix",

abstract = "The benefits,limitations and drawbacks of partnering versus not partnering public construction projects in US are discussed. Partnering allows design and construction teams to synergize as a teamtohance verallproject quality and timely completion. According to the data analyzed, partnered projects out-performed non-partnered projects in cost growth in the \$0 to\$5 million range only.The partnering process had a positive effect in minimizing liquidated damages.Non-partnered projects had fewer number of tasksthan partnered projects which could be attributed to the increased efforts by the contractor on the partnered projects to find mutually agreeale solutions.",

author = "McFadden, \{Eric M.\} and Ernzen, \{James J.\}",

year = "2003",

month = dec,

day = "1",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "0784406715",

series = "Contruction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress",

pages = "741--749",

editor = "K.R. Molenaar and P.S. Chinowsky",

booktitle = "Construction Research Cogress, Winds of Change",

note = "Construction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress ; Conference date: 19-03-2003 Through 21-03-2003",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Partnered Project Performance At The City Of Phoenix

AU - McFadden, Eric M.

AU - Ernzen, James J.

PY - 2003/12/1

Y1 - 2003/12/1

N2 - The benefits,limitations and drawbacks of partnering versus not partnering public construction projects in US are discussed. Partnering allows design and construction teams to synergize as a teamtohance verallproject quality and timely completion. According to the data analyzed, partnered projects out-performed non-partnered projects in cost growth in the $0 to$5 million range only.The partnering process had a positive effect in minimizing liquidated damages.Non-partnered projects had fewer number of tasksthan partnered projects which could be attributed to the increased efforts by the contractor on the partnered projects to find mutually agreeale solutions.

AB - The benefits,limitations and drawbacks of partnering versus not partnering public construction projects in US are discussed. Partnering allows design and construction teams to synergize as a teamtohance verallproject quality and timely completion. According to the data analyzed, partnered projects out-performed non-partnered projects in cost growth in the $0 to$5 million range only.The partnering process had a positive effect in minimizing liquidated damages.Non-partnered projects had fewer number of tasksthan partnered projects which could be attributed to the increased efforts by the contractor on the partnered projects to find mutually agreeale solutions.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/2342437256

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/2342437256#tab=citedBy

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 0784406715

T3 - Contruction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress

SP - 741

EP - 749

BT - Construction Research Cogress, Winds of Change

A2 - Molenaar, K.R.

A2 - Chinowsky, P.S.

T2 - Construction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress

Y2 - 19 March 2003 through 21 March 2003

ER -

Partnered Project Performance At The City Of Phoenix

Abstract

Publication series

Other

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this