TY - JOUR
T1 - Paths to Positivity
T2 - Relational Trajectories and Interaction in Positive Stepparent-Stepchild Dyads
AU - R. Waldron, Vincent
AU - O. Braithwaite, Dawn
AU - M. Oliver-Blackburn, Bailey
AU - Avalos, Brianna L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Stepfamilies are inherently complex family systems, marked by change, flexible boundaries, and early conflict. But the developmental pathways by which long-term stepparent relationships become positive require more study. We interviewed 38 stepchildren who had reached adulthood, to understand how their relationships with a stepparent became positive. Four relational trajectories defined these positive relationships: punctuated, consistent positive, progressive incline, and modulated turbulent. Distinctive communicative practices were associated with each trajectory, such as communicating assurances, “siding,” or revelations of character. In addition, the trajectories shared three common processes: responsiveness to stepchild vulnerability, stepparent “adding value” to the family, and maturation/reframing of the past. Findings support the existence of multiple pathways to positivity and suggest that major fluctuations are experienced along the way. Findings are interpreted in light of existing research on stepfamily development and Afifi’s theory of resilience and relational load. Recommendations are offered for stepfamilies and professionals who serve them.
AB - Stepfamilies are inherently complex family systems, marked by change, flexible boundaries, and early conflict. But the developmental pathways by which long-term stepparent relationships become positive require more study. We interviewed 38 stepchildren who had reached adulthood, to understand how their relationships with a stepparent became positive. Four relational trajectories defined these positive relationships: punctuated, consistent positive, progressive incline, and modulated turbulent. Distinctive communicative practices were associated with each trajectory, such as communicating assurances, “siding,” or revelations of character. In addition, the trajectories shared three common processes: responsiveness to stepchild vulnerability, stepparent “adding value” to the family, and maturation/reframing of the past. Findings support the existence of multiple pathways to positivity and suggest that major fluctuations are experienced along the way. Findings are interpreted in light of existing research on stepfamily development and Afifi’s theory of resilience and relational load. Recommendations are offered for stepfamilies and professionals who serve them.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121690953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121690953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15267431.2021.1999243
DO - 10.1080/15267431.2021.1999243
M3 - Article
SN - 1526-7431
VL - 22
SP - 33
EP - 54
JO - Journal of Family Communication
JF - Journal of Family Communication
IS - 1
ER -