@article{cf6e01e5d33c498fb179ef9be9fa5407,
title = "Policy programs and service delivery models for older adults and their caregivers: Comparing three provinces and two states",
abstract = "Despite an increase in prevalence of complex chronic conditions and dementia, long-term care services are being continuously pushed out of institutional settings and into the home and community. The majority of people living with dementia in Canada and the United States (U.S.) live at home with support provided by family, friends or other unpaid caregivers. Ten dementia care policy programs and service delivery models across five different North American jurisdictions in Canada and the U.S. are compared deductively using a comparative policy framework originally developed by Richard Rose. One aim of this research was to understand how different jurisdictions have worked to reduce the fragmentation of dementia care. Another aim is to assess, relying on the theory of smart policy layering, the extent to which these policy efforts {\textquoteleft}patch{\textquoteright} health system structures or add to system redundancies. We find that these programs were introduced in a manner that did not fully consider how to patch current programs and services and thus risk creating further system redundancies. The implementation of these policy programs may have led to policy layers, and potentially to tension among different policies and unintended consequences. One approach to reducing these negative impacts is to implement evaluative efforts that assess {\textquoteleft}goodness of fit{\textquoteright}. The degree to which these programs have embedded these efforts into an existing policy infrastructure successfully is low, with the possible exception of one program in NY.",
keywords = "comparative analysis, comparative policy, dementia, incrementalism, older adults, policy analysis, policy layering",
author = "Allie Peckham and Marianne Saragosa and Madeline King and Monika Roerig and James Shaw and Stephen Bornstein and Kimberlyn McGrail and Madeline Morris and Yuchi Young and Papenkov, {Maksim V.} and Greg Marchildon",
note = "Funding Information: This research was conducted as part of a larger mixed methods study funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Alzheimer Society of Canada. In developing the proposed study, these five jurisdictions were selected as they all have similar regulatory and institutional constraints, and all have seen a political drive to improve care coordination for individuals living with dementia and their caregivers. The first phase of this larger project was to conduct a jurisdictional review of these policy programs. These reviews were used to inform this analysis and the development of qualitative interviews for the second phase of the project. An adapted comparative public policy framework by Rose ( 2005 ) was used to synthesise the policy programs. Rose's framework involves seven elements: laws and regulations, organisational set‐up, personnel, money, program outputs/objectives, program recipients and goals. Three additional elements were added to capture relevant information; policy initiatives, guidelines and strategic frameworks; information management and evaluation and leadership and priority setting. These additional elements were included to offer a richer understanding of the broader political context within which these policy programs are embedded. Please refer to Table 1 for a description of each of these elements. Funding Information: This work was supported by the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) #150705 and the Alzheimer Society of Canada #17D. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors. Health and Social Care in the Community published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2022",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1111/hsc.13820",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "e4264--e4279",
journal = "Health and Social Care in the Community",
issn = "0966-0410",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",
}