TY - JOUR
T1 - Prosecution in Arizona
T2 - Practical problems, prosecutorial accountability, and local solutions
AU - Miller, Marc L.
AU - Caplinger, Samantha
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Arizona prosecutors focus on solving local crime problems and administrative challenges. Both workaday habits and provocative innovations emerge without much attention being paid to statewide or national concerns. Arizona prosecutors dramatically downplay their own power and discretion. They do not recognize the risk of disparity highlighted in the scholarly literature. They see themselves as operating within a context of established habits, office structures, and procedures including supervisory review. The local perspective is not a barrier to innovation, but innovations are largely restricted to the places where they take root. Institutions that invite statewide interaction and priority setting, such as the Arizona Prosecuting Attorneys Advisory Council, the Arizona Attorney General Office, and the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission, do not in practice facilitate statewide developments. Other collaborations, including various initiatives under the label "community prosecution," work toward local variation rather than toward statewide consistency.
AB - Arizona prosecutors focus on solving local crime problems and administrative challenges. Both workaday habits and provocative innovations emerge without much attention being paid to statewide or national concerns. Arizona prosecutors dramatically downplay their own power and discretion. They do not recognize the risk of disparity highlighted in the scholarly literature. They see themselves as operating within a context of established habits, office structures, and procedures including supervisory review. The local perspective is not a barrier to innovation, but innovations are largely restricted to the places where they take root. Institutions that invite statewide interaction and priority setting, such as the Arizona Prosecuting Attorneys Advisory Council, the Arizona Attorney General Office, and the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission, do not in practice facilitate statewide developments. Other collaborations, including various initiatives under the label "community prosecution," work toward local variation rather than toward statewide consistency.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883396269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883396269&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/665988
DO - 10.1086/665988
M3 - Review article
SN - 0192-3234
VL - 41
SP - 265
EP - 310
JO - Crime and Justice
JF - Crime and Justice
IS - 1
ER -