TY - JOUR
T1 - Renovating the pyramid of needs
T2 - Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations
AU - Kenrick, Douglas
AU - Griskevicius, Vladas
AU - Neuberg, Steven
AU - Schaller, Mark
N1 - Funding Information: The contributions of Douglas T. Kenrick and Steven L. Neuberg were supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH064734) and National Science Foundation (#0642873). The contributions of Mark Schaller were supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. We thank Adam B. Cohen and Ed Diener for comments on an earlier draft.
PY - 2010/5
Y1 - 2010/5
N2 - Maslow's pyramid of human needs, proposed in 1943, has been one of the most cognitively contagious ideas in the behavioral sciences. Anticipating later evolutionary views of human motivation and cognition, Maslow viewed human motives as based in innate and universal predispositions. We revisit the idea of a motivational hierarchy in light of theoretical developments at the interface of evolutionary biology, anthropology, and psychology. After considering motives at three different levels of analysis, we argue that the basic foundational structure of the pyramid is worth preserving, but that it should be buttressed with a few architectural extensions. By adding a contemporary design feature, connections between fundamental motives and immediate situational threats and opportunities should be highlighted. By incorporating a classical element, these connections can be strengthened by anchoring the hierarchy of human motives more firmly in the bedrock of modern evolutionary theory. We propose a renovated hierarchy of fundamental motives that serves as both an integrative framework and a generative foundation for future empirical research.
AB - Maslow's pyramid of human needs, proposed in 1943, has been one of the most cognitively contagious ideas in the behavioral sciences. Anticipating later evolutionary views of human motivation and cognition, Maslow viewed human motives as based in innate and universal predispositions. We revisit the idea of a motivational hierarchy in light of theoretical developments at the interface of evolutionary biology, anthropology, and psychology. After considering motives at three different levels of analysis, we argue that the basic foundational structure of the pyramid is worth preserving, but that it should be buttressed with a few architectural extensions. By adding a contemporary design feature, connections between fundamental motives and immediate situational threats and opportunities should be highlighted. By incorporating a classical element, these connections can be strengthened by anchoring the hierarchy of human motives more firmly in the bedrock of modern evolutionary theory. We propose a renovated hierarchy of fundamental motives that serves as both an integrative framework and a generative foundation for future empirical research.
KW - Development
KW - Evolutionary psychology
KW - Humanistic psychology
KW - Life-history theory
KW - Motivation
KW - Positive psychology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650125511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650125511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1745691610369469
DO - 10.1177/1745691610369469
M3 - Article
SN - 1745-6916
VL - 5
SP - 292
EP - 314
JO - Perspectives on Psychological Science
JF - Perspectives on Psychological Science
IS - 3
ER -