Abstract
Throughout much of representative bureaucracy literature, scholars have primarily focused on the representation of people seen as other in the professional workforce—people of color and women. However, whiteness and masculinity have been central to the development of public administration as a field of scholarship and practice. As a field, we have often avoided explicit discussions regarding the impact whiteness and masculinity. We argue that silences around race and gender have significant implications. Using representative bureaucracy as a frame, we seek to highlight how acknowledging whiteness and masculinity in our scholarship can help provide a more comprehensive understanding of race and gender in public administration.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 594-597 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Public administration review |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 1 2022 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Administration
- Marketing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Representative Bureaucracy Theory and the Implicit Embrace of Whiteness and Masculinity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Press/Media
-
University of Kansas: Public Administration Should Consider Effects of Whiteness, Masculinity as Well as Representation, Researchers Say
2/18/22
1 item of Media coverage
Press/Media: Press / Media
-
Public administration should consider effects of whiteness, masculinity and representation, researchers say
2/17/22
2 items of Media coverage
Press/Media: Press / Media
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS