TY - JOUR
T1 - Reproductive inequality among males in the genus Pan
AU - Mouginot, Maud
AU - Cheng, Leveda
AU - Wilson, Michael L.
AU - Feldblum, Joseph T.
AU - Städele, Veronika
AU - Wroblewski, Emily E.
AU - Vigilant, Linda
AU - Hahn, Beatrice H.
AU - Li, Yingying
AU - Gilby, Ian C.
AU - Pusey, Anne E.
AU - Surbeck, Martin
N1 - Funding Information: We thank the Institut Congolais pour la Conservations de la Nature and the Ministry of Scientific Research and Technology in the Democratic Republic of the Congo for their support and permission to work in the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo, as well as the Bonobo Conservation Initiative and Vie Sauvage, especially Sally Coxe and Albert Lotana Lokasola, and the Jane Goodall Institute, for supporting our work at the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve and the Gombe National Park. We are grateful to the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology, the Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute and the Tanzania National Parks, for their support and permission to work at Gombe. We thank all the field staff and visiting researchers at the Kokolopori Bonobo Research Project and the Gombe Stream Research Centre for contributing to the long-term database. We also thank Nisarg Desai for providing statistical advice. Funding Information: We are grateful to the following funders for making this research possible: Harvard University, Duke University, Franklin and Marshall College, George Washington University, the University of Minnesota, the Max Planck Society, the Institute for Advanced Study Toulouse (IAST) funding from the French National Research Agency (ANR) under grant no. ANR-17-EURE-0010 (Investissements d'Avenir program), the Leakey Foundation, the National Institutes of Health (grant nos. R00 HD057992, R01 AI 091595, R01 AI050529 and R01 AI120810), the National Science Foundation (grant nos. DBS-9021946, SBR-9319909, BCS-0452315, IOS-1052693, IOS-1457260, BCS-0648481, BCS-1753437 and BCS-1743506), the Arcus Foundation, Carnegie Corporation, the Leo S. Guthman Foundation, Margo Marsh, Mazuri (AAZV), the Morris Animal Foundation, the National Geographic Society, the Harris Steel Group, the Wilkie Foundation, the William T. Grant Foundation, the Windibrow Foundation, the Jane Goodall Institute, and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Feodor Lynen Return Fellowship). Acknowledgements Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s).
PY - 2023/8/14
Y1 - 2023/8/14
N2 - Reproductive inequality, or reproductive skew, drives natural selection, but has been difficult to assess, particularly for males in species with promiscuous mating and slow life histories, such as bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Although bonobos are often portrayed as more egalitarian than chimpanzees, genetic studies have found high male reproductive skew in bonobos. Here, we discuss mechanisms likely to affect male reproductive skew in Pan, then re-examine skew patterns using paternity data from published work and new data from the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo and Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Using the multinomial index (M), we found considerable overlap in skew between the species, but the highest skew occurred among bonobos. Additionally, for two of three bonobo communities, but no chimpanzee communities, the highest ranking male had greater siring success than predicted by priority-of-access. Thus, an expanded dataset covering a broader demographic range confirms that bonobos have high male reproductive skew. Detailed comparison of data from Pan highlights that reproductive skew models should consider male-male dynamics including the effect of between-group competition on incentives for reproductive concessions, but also female grouping patterns and factors related to male-female dynamics including the expression of female choice. This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolutionary ecology of inequality'.
AB - Reproductive inequality, or reproductive skew, drives natural selection, but has been difficult to assess, particularly for males in species with promiscuous mating and slow life histories, such as bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Although bonobos are often portrayed as more egalitarian than chimpanzees, genetic studies have found high male reproductive skew in bonobos. Here, we discuss mechanisms likely to affect male reproductive skew in Pan, then re-examine skew patterns using paternity data from published work and new data from the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo and Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Using the multinomial index (M), we found considerable overlap in skew between the species, but the highest skew occurred among bonobos. Additionally, for two of three bonobo communities, but no chimpanzee communities, the highest ranking male had greater siring success than predicted by priority-of-access. Thus, an expanded dataset covering a broader demographic range confirms that bonobos have high male reproductive skew. Detailed comparison of data from Pan highlights that reproductive skew models should consider male-male dynamics including the effect of between-group competition on incentives for reproductive concessions, but also female grouping patterns and factors related to male-female dynamics including the expression of female choice. This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolutionary ecology of inequality'.
KW - bonobo
KW - chimpanzee
KW - multinomial index
KW - priority-of-access model
KW - reproductive skew
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163597978&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85163597978&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1098/rstb.2022.0301
DO - 10.1098/rstb.2022.0301
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37381849
SN - 0962-8436
VL - 378
JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
IS - 1883
M1 - 20220301
ER -