TY - JOUR
T1 - Scaling of work and energy use in social insect colonies
AU - Fewell, Jennifer
AU - Harrison, Jon
N1 - Funding Information: This research was partially supported by the National Science Foundation Division of Mathematical Sciences, Grant 1313115 to JHF, and the National Science Foundation Division of Integrative and Organismal Systems, Grants 1122157 and 1110796 to JFH. The authors thank Simon Robson and James Traniello for organizing the division of labor symposium and special issue, and James Waters, Tate Holbrook, Rebecca Clark, Raphael Jeanson, Sue Bertram, Root Gorelick, Yun Kang, and the members of ASU’s Social Insect Research Group for many useful discussions on this topic. Publisher Copyright: © 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - Group size has profound effects on the organization of work. In the social insects, larger colony size is consistently associated with lower mass-specific energy use; similar hypometric relationships between group size and per-gram energy use may extend across other social taxa. The specific mechanisms driving social metabolic scaling vary among species, but evidence suggests that it can be associated with organizational changes in work (task) performance that allow more efficient energy use by larger groups. In social insect colonies, larger group size allows stronger individual specialization, greater diversity in task performance, and likely gives improved resilience to stochastic events. Larger colonies often also allocate a larger proportion of workers to maintenance and reserve rather than to foraging and brood care tasks, potentially reducing costs. For the few species examined, these organizational changes seem to be associated with lower mean but higher variance in movement rates, providing a concrete connection to metabolic use. Interestingly, colony group size is not generally associated with changes in the proportional number of colony workers resting versus doing work, but this may vary across social systems. Colonies with hypometric metabolic scaling tend to show constant or greater efficiency of brood production, consistent with efficiency rather than constraint-based scaling models. These patterns of work and energetics in social groups show distinct parallels with organismal scaling. Investigation into social metabolic scaling could contribute to identifying unifying scaling theories for the disparate fields of animal behavior, physiology, and human sociology.
AB - Group size has profound effects on the organization of work. In the social insects, larger colony size is consistently associated with lower mass-specific energy use; similar hypometric relationships between group size and per-gram energy use may extend across other social taxa. The specific mechanisms driving social metabolic scaling vary among species, but evidence suggests that it can be associated with organizational changes in work (task) performance that allow more efficient energy use by larger groups. In social insect colonies, larger group size allows stronger individual specialization, greater diversity in task performance, and likely gives improved resilience to stochastic events. Larger colonies often also allocate a larger proportion of workers to maintenance and reserve rather than to foraging and brood care tasks, potentially reducing costs. For the few species examined, these organizational changes seem to be associated with lower mean but higher variance in movement rates, providing a concrete connection to metabolic use. Interestingly, colony group size is not generally associated with changes in the proportional number of colony workers resting versus doing work, but this may vary across social systems. Colonies with hypometric metabolic scaling tend to show constant or greater efficiency of brood production, consistent with efficiency rather than constraint-based scaling models. These patterns of work and energetics in social groups show distinct parallels with organismal scaling. Investigation into social metabolic scaling could contribute to identifying unifying scaling theories for the disparate fields of animal behavior, physiology, and human sociology.
KW - Division of labor
KW - Group size
KW - Metabolic rate
KW - Metabolic scaling
KW - Social insects
KW - Task allocation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961564544&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961564544&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00265-016-2097-z
DO - 10.1007/s00265-016-2097-z
M3 - Review article
SN - 0340-5443
VL - 70
SP - 1047
EP - 1061
JO - Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
JF - Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
IS - 7
ER -