TY - JOUR
T1 - Selecting project delivery methods for water treatment plants
AU - Feghaly, Jeffrey
AU - El Asmar, Mounir
AU - Ariaratnam, Samuel
AU - Bearup, Wylie
N1 - Funding Information: This paper’s contribution consists of identifying and prioritizing the 13 key project delivery method selection factors for the water industry, emerging from a systematic literature review, industry project delivery method selection models, and significant industry input through organized workshops. As a bi-product of the effort, EXPRSS-TP, a comprehensive decision-support model, was also developed to disseminate the findings through a simple-to-use interface that can be operated by decision-makers in the water industry. Determining the most appropriate project delivery method to utilize is one of the most important decisions utilities must take for their projects. The identification of 13 key factors most critical for the delivery of water treatment plants will allow decision-makers in this industry to select the delivery method that is most aligned with their project’s unique objectives and characteristics. Utilities using the findings of this work will be able to gauge which project delivery method best positions their current project for success, based on their organization’s attributes and resources available at the time. A project delivery method selection process is typically an informal process that may range from days to weeks at a time. Based on this work, the assessment can now be completed in about one hour and provides decision-makers with the most favorable delivery method for their project. And with the new tool that encompasses the new knowledge, not only is the decision reached at an accelerated pace, EXPRSS-TP also documents the entire selection process, allowing for a written and retained record of this key decision and its procedure. Regarding the limitations of the work, the research study was designed, conducted and reviewed with the intent of assisting water industry decision-makers for their water treatment plant projects only. Although some aspects of the work may be applicable to projects in other industries, one limitation is its focus on the water industry solely, as it has not been tested in other industries and adapted appropriately. Future research work can be conducted to adapt and test the findings to fit other project types (e.g. pipeline projects) or even other industries (e.g. building projects) that could also use support with project delivery method selection. This work is funded by the Water Research Foundation (WRF) Project No. 4685 “Project Delivery Performance Evaluation and Decision Support Tool for Water and Wastewater Capital Projects.” The authors would also like to thank the Arizona State University Decision Theater for providing their technical support with developing a web-based version of the tool and all industry experts who assisted in testing and reviewing the tool; without their support this work would not have been possible. Funding Information: ”, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, MN . Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) ( 2011 ), Project Delivery Selection Approach , Nevada Department of Transportation , Carson City, NV . Orange County Public Works Department (OCPW) ( 2017 ), Project Delivery Method Selection Tool Guide , Orange County Public Works Department , Santa Ana, CA . Figure 1 Research methodology Figure 2 Examples of EXPRSS-TP’s interface in (a) prerequisite factors section and (b) primary factors section Table I Overview of project delivery method selection tools Table II Existing project delivery selection decision-support models Organization (organized alphabetically) Year Application industry Title of publication Airports Council International-North America (ACI-NA), Airport Consultants Council (ACC) and the Associated General Contractors of America (AGC) 2012 Airport Airport Owners’ Guide to Project Delivery Systems Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) a 2009 Airport A Guidebook for Selecting Airport Capital Project Delivery Methods Association of California Construction Managers (ACCM) 2017 Education Project Delivery Handbook: A Guide to California School and Community College Facility Delivery Alaska Department of Education and Early Development (ADEED) a 2017 Education Project Delivery Method Handbook American Institute of Architects/Associated General Contractors of America (AIA/AGC) 2011 Multi-industry Primer on Project Delivery Construction Management Association of America (CMAA) 2012 Multi-industry An Owner’s Guide To Project Delivery Methods Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA) 2015 Multi-industry Choosing a Project Delivery Method: A Design-Build Done Right Primer Orange County Public Works Department (OCPWD) 2017 Multi-industry Project Delivery Method Selection Tool Guide Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) a 2009 Transit A Guidebook for the Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) a 2014 Transportation Project Delivery Selection Matrix Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) 2014 Transportation Project Delivery Method Selection Workshop Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) 2011 Transportation Project Delivery Selection Approach Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) a 2016 Transportation Project Delivery Method Selection Guidance Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) 2002 Water Alternative Project Delivery Water Design Build Council (WDBC) 2016 Water Water and Wastewater Design-Build Handbook Note: a Highlighted organizations are primary sources used for the development of the water project delivery decision-support tool Table III Summary of literature from 2011 to present vs selection factors Table IV Decision-support tool primary and secondary selection factors Category Selection factor no. Selection factor No. of questions Primary factors 1 Level of design complete 4 2 Procurement 3 3 Project delivery schedule 2 4 Owner involvement, experience, and control 5 5 Risk management and allocation 2 6 Project cost control and early cost estimate 6 7 Project complexity and innovation 6 Secondary factors 8 Maintainability and quality 5 9 Staffing requirements and capabilities 4 10 Funding, site, and impact on existing operations 4 11 Sustainability goals and security 2 12 Third-party involvement and community and stakeholder input 4 13 Adversarial relationships, construction claims, and potential for change during/after construction 4 Publisher Copyright: © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2020/4/21
Y1 - 2020/4/21
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify key project delivery method selection factors to assist water industry decision-makers in selecting the most appropriate delivery method for their water treatment plant projects. Design/methodology/approach: The selection factors were identified by compiling and validating key project delivery selection factors across various industries through an extensive literature review and two industry expert workshops. This resulted in the development of a web-based decision-support tool to facilitate project delivery method selection within the water industry. Findings: The research effort led to the identification of 13 key project delivery method selection factors (seven primary factors and six secondary factors) for water treatment plant projects. These factors were utilized to develop EXPRSS-TP, a pioneering web-based project delivery method decision-support tool for the water industry. Practical implications: A project delivery method selection process is typically an informal process that may range from days to weeks at a time. Based on this work, the assessment can now be completed in about one hour and provides decision-makers with the most favorable delivery method for their project. And with the new tool that encompasses the new knowledge, not only is the decision reached at an accelerated pace, EXPRSS-TP also documents the entire selection process, allowing for a written and retained record of this key decision and its procedure. Originality/value: This paper contributes to the exisiting body of knowledge by identifying key project delivery selection factors across numerous industries, assessing and combining them, and finally incorporating them into one comprehensive process. EXPRSS-TP improves the traditional project delivery method selection process and provides evidence-based project delivery method selection recommendations.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify key project delivery method selection factors to assist water industry decision-makers in selecting the most appropriate delivery method for their water treatment plant projects. Design/methodology/approach: The selection factors were identified by compiling and validating key project delivery selection factors across various industries through an extensive literature review and two industry expert workshops. This resulted in the development of a web-based decision-support tool to facilitate project delivery method selection within the water industry. Findings: The research effort led to the identification of 13 key project delivery method selection factors (seven primary factors and six secondary factors) for water treatment plant projects. These factors were utilized to develop EXPRSS-TP, a pioneering web-based project delivery method decision-support tool for the water industry. Practical implications: A project delivery method selection process is typically an informal process that may range from days to weeks at a time. Based on this work, the assessment can now be completed in about one hour and provides decision-makers with the most favorable delivery method for their project. And with the new tool that encompasses the new knowledge, not only is the decision reached at an accelerated pace, EXPRSS-TP also documents the entire selection process, allowing for a written and retained record of this key decision and its procedure. Originality/value: This paper contributes to the exisiting body of knowledge by identifying key project delivery selection factors across numerous industries, assessing and combining them, and finally incorporating them into one comprehensive process. EXPRSS-TP improves the traditional project delivery method selection process and provides evidence-based project delivery method selection recommendations.
KW - Alternative project delivery methods
KW - Construction management at risk
KW - Decision-support tool
KW - Design-build
KW - Management
KW - Project delivery method selection factors
KW - Water industry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075053393&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075053393&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/ECAM-06-2019-0308
DO - 10.1108/ECAM-06-2019-0308
M3 - Article
SN - 0969-9988
VL - 27
SP - 936
EP - 951
JO - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
JF - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
IS - 4
ER -