Self and shared leadership in decision quality: a tale of two sides

Matteo Cristofaro, Christopher P. Neck, Pier Luigi Giardino, Christopher B. Neck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the relationship between shared leadership (SL) and decision quality, utilizing shared leadership theory (SLT) and behavioral decision theory (BDT). The authors will explore the mediating role of “decision comprehensiveness” in the SL–decision quality linkage. Additionally, the authors will examine how individual “self-leadership” and “debate” among team members moderate the relationship between SL and decision comprehensiveness. Design/methodology/approach: The authors tested the hypothesized moderated mediation model using a sample of 506 professionals employed in 112 research and development (R&D) teams, along with their direct managers from large Italian firms. To examine the relationships, the authors employed confirmatory factor analyses and path analyses. In order to address endogeneity concerns, the authors incorporated an instrumental variable, namely delegation, into the analysis. Findings: SL positively influences decision quality, mediated by decision comprehensiveness, where teams include comprehensive information in decision-making. The level of debate among team members positively moderates the SL–decision comprehensiveness relationship. High levels of self-leadership can harm SL by reducing decision comprehensiveness, indicating a downside. However, low or moderate levels of self-leadership do not harm decision comprehensiveness and can even benefit SL. Originality/value: This is the first work to investigate the relationship between SL and decision quality, shedding light on the mechanisms underlying this association. By integrating SLT and BDT, the authors provide insights into how managers can make higher-quality decisions within self-leading teams. Moreover, this research makes a distinct contribution to the field of self-leadership by delineating its boundaries and identifying a potentially negative aspect within the self-influence process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2541-2563
Number of pages23
JournalManagement Decision
Volume61
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 24 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Behavior decision theory
  • Biases
  • Decision comprehensiveness
  • Decision quality
  • Self-leadership
  • Shared leadership
  • Shared leadership theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Business, Management and Accounting
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self and shared leadership in decision quality: a tale of two sides'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this