Self-Talk: An Interdisciplinary Review and Transdisciplinary Model

Alexander T. Latinjak, Alain Morin, Thomas M. Brinthaupt, James Hardy, Antonis Hatzigeorgiadis, Philip C. Kendall, Christopher Neck, Emily J. Oliver, Małgorzata M. Puchalska-Wasyl, Alla V. Tovares, Adam Winsler

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    18 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    The present work synthesises the self-talk literature and constructs a transdisciplinary self-talk model to guide future research across all academic disciplines that engage with self-talk. A comprehensive research review was conducted, including 559 self-talk articles published between 1978 and 2020. These articles were divided into 6 research categories: (a) inner dialogue, (b) mixed spontaneous and goal-directed organic self-talk, (c) goal-directed self-talk, (d) spontaneous self-talk, (e) educational self-talk interventions, and (f) strategic self-talk interventions. Following this, critical details were extracted from a subsample of 100 articles to create an interdisciplinary synthesis of the self-talk literature. Based on the synthesis, a self-talk model was created that places spontaneous and goal-directed organic self-talk as well as educational and strategic self-talk interventions in relation to variables within their nomological network, including external factors (e.g. task difficulty), descriptive states and traits (e.g. emotions), behaviour and performance, metacognition, and psychological skills (e.g. concentration).

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)355-386
    Number of pages32
    JournalReview of General Psychology
    Volume27
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 2023

    Keywords

    • automatic thoughts
    • inner speech
    • internal dialogue
    • private speech
    • self-instructions
    • self-regulation
    • self-verbalisations

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Psychology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Self-Talk: An Interdisciplinary Review and Transdisciplinary Model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this