TY - JOUR
T1 - Sequential Bayesian experimental design with variable cost structure
AU - Zheng, Sue
AU - Hayden, David S.
AU - Pacheco, Jason
AU - Fisher, John W.
N1 - Funding Information: This research was partially supported by ONR (Award No. N00014-17-1-2072) and DOE/NNSA (Award No. DE-NA0003921). Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Neural information processing systems foundation. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Mutual information (MI) is a commonly adopted utility function in Bayesian optimal experimental design (BOED). While theoretically appealing, MI evaluation poses a significant computational burden for most real world applications. As a result, many algorithms utilize MI bounds as proxies that lack regret-style guarantees. Here, we utilize two-sided bounds to provide such guarantees. Bounds are successively refined/tightened through additional computation until a desired guarantee is achieved. We consider the problem of adaptively allocating computational resources in BOED. Our approach achieves the same guarantee as existing methods, but with fewer evaluations of the costly MI reward. We adapt knapsack optimization of best arm identification problems, with important differences that impact overall algorithm design and performance. First, observations of MI rewards are biased. Second, evaluating experiments incurs shared costs amongst all experiments (posterior sampling) in addition to per-experiment costs that may vary with increasing evaluation. We propose and demonstrate an algorithm that accounts for these variable costs in the refinement decision.
AB - Mutual information (MI) is a commonly adopted utility function in Bayesian optimal experimental design (BOED). While theoretically appealing, MI evaluation poses a significant computational burden for most real world applications. As a result, many algorithms utilize MI bounds as proxies that lack regret-style guarantees. Here, we utilize two-sided bounds to provide such guarantees. Bounds are successively refined/tightened through additional computation until a desired guarantee is achieved. We consider the problem of adaptively allocating computational resources in BOED. Our approach achieves the same guarantee as existing methods, but with fewer evaluations of the costly MI reward. We adapt knapsack optimization of best arm identification problems, with important differences that impact overall algorithm design and performance. First, observations of MI rewards are biased. Second, evaluating experiments incurs shared costs amongst all experiments (posterior sampling) in addition to per-experiment costs that may vary with increasing evaluation. We propose and demonstrate an algorithm that accounts for these variable costs in the refinement decision.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101949682&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101949682&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article
SN - 1049-5258
VL - 2020-December
JO - Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
JF - Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
T2 - 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS 2020
Y2 - 6 December 2020 through 12 December 2020
ER -