TY - JOUR
T1 - Shock Cooling and Possible Precursor Emission in the Early Light Curve of the Type II SN 2023ixf
AU - Hosseinzadeh, Griffin
AU - Farah, Joseph
AU - Shrestha, Manisha
AU - Sand, David J.
AU - Dong, Yize
AU - Brown, Peter J.
AU - Bostroem, K. Azalee
AU - Valenti, Stefano
AU - Jha, Saurabh W.
AU - Andrews, Jennifer E.
AU - Arcavi, Iair
AU - Haislip, Joshua
AU - Hiramatsu, Daichi
AU - Hoang, Emily
AU - Howell, D. Andrew
AU - Janzen, Daryl
AU - Jencson, Jacob E.
AU - Kouprianov, Vladimir
AU - Lundquist, Michael
AU - McCully, Curtis
AU - Meza Retamal, Nicolas E.
AU - Modjaz, Maryam
AU - Newsome, Megan
AU - Gonzalez, Estefania Padilla
AU - Pearson, Jeniveve
AU - Pellegrino, Craig
AU - Ravi, Aravind P.
AU - Reichart, Daniel E.
AU - Smith, Nathan
AU - Terreran, Giacomo
AU - Vinkó, József
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.
PY - 2023/8/1
Y1 - 2023/8/1
N2 - We present the densely sampled early light curve of the Type II supernova (SN) 2023ixf, first observed within hours of explosion in the nearby Pinwheel Galaxy (Messier 101; 6.7 Mpc). Comparing these data to recently updated models of shock-cooling emission, we find that the progenitor likely had a radius of 410 ± 10 R ⊙. Our estimate is model dependent but consistent with a red supergiant. These models provide a good fit to the data starting about 1 day after the explosion, despite the fact that the classification spectrum shows signatures of circumstellar material around SN 2023ixf during that time. Photometry during the first day after the explosion, provided almost entirely by amateur astronomers, does not agree with the shock-cooling models or a simple power-law rise fit to data after 1 day. We consider the possible causes of this discrepancy, including precursor activity from the progenitor star, circumstellar interaction, and emission from the shock before or after it breaks out of the stellar surface. The very low luminosity (−11 mag > M > −14 mag) and short duration of the initial excess lead us to prefer a scenario related to prolonged emission from the SN shock traveling through the progenitor system.
AB - We present the densely sampled early light curve of the Type II supernova (SN) 2023ixf, first observed within hours of explosion in the nearby Pinwheel Galaxy (Messier 101; 6.7 Mpc). Comparing these data to recently updated models of shock-cooling emission, we find that the progenitor likely had a radius of 410 ± 10 R ⊙. Our estimate is model dependent but consistent with a red supergiant. These models provide a good fit to the data starting about 1 day after the explosion, despite the fact that the classification spectrum shows signatures of circumstellar material around SN 2023ixf during that time. Photometry during the first day after the explosion, provided almost entirely by amateur astronomers, does not agree with the shock-cooling models or a simple power-law rise fit to data after 1 day. We consider the possible causes of this discrepancy, including precursor activity from the progenitor star, circumstellar interaction, and emission from the shock before or after it breaks out of the stellar surface. The very low luminosity (−11 mag > M > −14 mag) and short duration of the initial excess lead us to prefer a scenario related to prolonged emission from the SN shock traveling through the progenitor system.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168386627&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85168386627&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3847/2041-8213/ace4c4
DO - 10.3847/2041-8213/ace4c4
M3 - Article
SN - 2041-8205
VL - 953
JO - Astrophysical Journal Letters
JF - Astrophysical Journal Letters
IS - 1
M1 - L16
ER -