TY - CHAP
T1 - Structural and Thermal Evolution of the Himalayan Thrust Belt in Midwestern Nepal
AU - DeCelles, P. G.
AU - Carrapa, B.
AU - Ojha, T. P.
AU - Gehrels, G. E.
AU - Collins, D.
N1 - Funding Information: We wish to thank Laurent Godin, Gautam Mitra, Rasmus Thiede, and an anonymous reviewer for thorough and critical reviews, in some cases regarding issues of fundamental disagreement, which helped us to significantly improve the manuscript. Joan Florsheim and April Leo provided editorial assistance. Research reported here was funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (grants EAR0105480, EAR0207179, EAR1140068, and EAR1763432) and the National Geographic Society. Peter Reiners, Uttam Chowdury, and Clark Isachsen helped with thermochronologic analyses and data reduction, and Mihai Ducea and Derek Hoffman provided Nd-isotope data. Arizona LaserChron staff members Mark Pecha, Niki Giesler, and Chel-sea White assisted with geochronological work. Significant parts of the manuscript were written while DeCelles and Car-rapa were guest professors at ETH Zentrum, Zürich, hosted by Sean Willett and Giuditta Fellin. The ideas and understanding expressed in this paper have developed over the past 25 years, largely in response to advice from and countless discussions with Jay Quade, Paul Kapp, Bishal Upreti, Delores Robinson, Carmala Garzione, Nadine McQuarrie, Aaron Martin, Ofori Pearson, Simon Stickroth, Ted Cross, Tshering Lama Sherpa, Anthony Krupa, Gautam Mitra, Peter Copeland, Sean Long, Renaud Soucy La Roche, Alex Webb, Mark Harrison, Matt Kohn, Elizabeth Catlos, Dan Schelling, Mike Murphy, Mike Taylor, Jean-Philippe Avouac, Albert Bally, Yani Najman, David Dettman, Kip Hodges, Eduardo Garzanti, Sean Willett, George Zandt, Vera Schulte-Pelkum, Harutaka Sakai, Jibami-tra Ganguly, Sumit Chakraborty, Bernhard Stoeckhert, Peter van der Beek, Lindsay Schoenbohm, Praveen Srivastava, John Nábělek, Robert Butler, Saad Haq, and Julian Célérier. We acknowledge the debt owed to pioneers of geological mapping in western Nepal (including T. Hagen, G. Fuchs, T. Sharma, J. Stöcklin, P. Bordet, and S.B. Shrestha and the geologists of the Nepalese Department of Mines and Geology). Finally, we thank our numerous Nepalese colleagues, porters, field assistants, drivers, and guides, without whom very little of this work could have been accomplished. Funding Information: We wish to thank Laurent Godin, Gautam Mitra, Rasmus Thiede, and an anonymous reviewer for thorough and critical reviews, in some cases regarding issues of fundamental disagreement, which helped us to significantly improve the manuscript. Joan Florsheim and April Leo provided editorial assistance. Research reported here was funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (grants EAR0105480, EAR0207179, EAR1140068, and EAR1763432) and the National Geographic Society. Peter Reiners, Uttam Chowdury, and Clark Isachsen helped with thermochronologic analyses and data reduction, and Mihai Ducea and Derek Hoffman provided Nd-isotope data. Arizona LaserChron staff members Mark Pecha, Niki Giesler, and Chelsea White assisted with geochronological work. Significant parts of the manuscript were written while DeCelles and Carrapa were guest professors at ETH Zentrum, Zürich, hosted by Sean Willett and Giuditta Fellin. The ideas and understanding expressed in this paper have developed over the past 25 years, largely in response to advice from and countless discussions with Jay Quade, Paul Kapp, Bishal Upreti, Delores Robinson, Carmala Garzione, Nadine McQuarrie, Aaron Martin, Ofori Pearson, Simon Stickroth, Ted Cross, Tshering Lama Sherpa, Anthony Krupa, Gautam Mitra, Peter Copeland, Sean Long, Renaud Soucy La Roche, Alex Webb, Mark Harrison, Matt Kohn, Elizabeth Catlos, Dan Schelling, Mike Murphy, Mike Taylor, Jean-Philippe Avouac, Albert Bally, Yani Najman, David Dettman, Kip Hodges, Eduardo Garzanti, Sean Willett, George Zandt, Vera Schulte-Pelkum, Harutaka Sakai, Jibamitra Ganguly, Sumit Chakraborty, Bernhard Stoeckhert, Peter van der Beek, Lindsay Schoenbohm, Praveen Srivastava, John Nábělek, Robert Butler, Saad Haq, and Julian Célérier. We acknowledge the debt owed to pioneers of geological mapping in western Nepal (including T. Hagen, G. Fuchs, T. Sharma, J. Stöcklin, P. Bordet, and S.B. Shrestha and the geologists of the Nepalese Department of Mines and Geology). Finally, we thank our numerous Nepalese colleagues, porters, field assistants, drivers, and guides, without whom very little of this work could have been accomplished. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Geological Society of America. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/5/22
Y1 - 2020/5/22
N2 - New geological mapping in midwestern Nepal, complemented by thermochronological and geochronological data sets, provides stratigraphic, structural, and kinematic information for this portion of the Himalayan thrust belt. Lithofacies and geochronologic data substantiate five genetic (tectono)stratigraphic packages: the Lesser Himalayan (ca. 1900–1600 Ma), Greater Himalayan (ca. 800–520 Ma), Tethyan Himalayan (Late Ordovician–Cretaceous), Gondwana (Permian–Paleocene), and Cenozoic Foreland Basin (Eocene–Pleistocene) Sequences. Major structures of midwestern Nepal are similar to those documented along strike in the Himalaya and include a frontal imbricate zone, the Main Boundary and Ramgarh thrusts, the synformal Dadeldhura and Jajarkot klippen of Greater Himalayan rocks, and the hybrid antiformal-stack/hinterland-dipping Lesser Himalayan duplex. Total (probably minimum) shortening between the Main Frontal thrust and the South Tibetan detachment is 400–580 km, increasing westward from the Kaligandaki River region. The Main Central and Ramgarh thrusts were active sequentially during the early to middle Miocene; the Lesser Himalayan duplex developed between ca. 11 Ma and 5 Ma; the Main Boundary thrust became active after ca. 5 Ma and remains active in places; and thrusts that cut the Siwalik Group foreland basin deposits in the frontal imbricate belt have been active since ca. 4–2 Ma. The Main Central “thrust” is a broad shear zone that includes the boundary between Lesser and Greater Himalayan Sequences as defined by their protolith characteristics (especially their ages and lithofacies). The shape of the major footwall frontal ramp beneath the Lesser Himalayan duplex is geometrically complex and has evolved progressively over the past ~10 m.y. This study provides the basis for understanding the Himalayan thrust belt and recent seismic activity in terms of critical taper models of orogenic wedges, and it will help to focus future efforts on better documenting crustal shortening in the northern half of the thrust belt.
AB - New geological mapping in midwestern Nepal, complemented by thermochronological and geochronological data sets, provides stratigraphic, structural, and kinematic information for this portion of the Himalayan thrust belt. Lithofacies and geochronologic data substantiate five genetic (tectono)stratigraphic packages: the Lesser Himalayan (ca. 1900–1600 Ma), Greater Himalayan (ca. 800–520 Ma), Tethyan Himalayan (Late Ordovician–Cretaceous), Gondwana (Permian–Paleocene), and Cenozoic Foreland Basin (Eocene–Pleistocene) Sequences. Major structures of midwestern Nepal are similar to those documented along strike in the Himalaya and include a frontal imbricate zone, the Main Boundary and Ramgarh thrusts, the synformal Dadeldhura and Jajarkot klippen of Greater Himalayan rocks, and the hybrid antiformal-stack/hinterland-dipping Lesser Himalayan duplex. Total (probably minimum) shortening between the Main Frontal thrust and the South Tibetan detachment is 400–580 km, increasing westward from the Kaligandaki River region. The Main Central and Ramgarh thrusts were active sequentially during the early to middle Miocene; the Lesser Himalayan duplex developed between ca. 11 Ma and 5 Ma; the Main Boundary thrust became active after ca. 5 Ma and remains active in places; and thrusts that cut the Siwalik Group foreland basin deposits in the frontal imbricate belt have been active since ca. 4–2 Ma. The Main Central “thrust” is a broad shear zone that includes the boundary between Lesser and Greater Himalayan Sequences as defined by their protolith characteristics (especially their ages and lithofacies). The shape of the major footwall frontal ramp beneath the Lesser Himalayan duplex is geometrically complex and has evolved progressively over the past ~10 m.y. This study provides the basis for understanding the Himalayan thrust belt and recent seismic activity in terms of critical taper models of orogenic wedges, and it will help to focus future efforts on better documenting crustal shortening in the northern half of the thrust belt.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126749014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126749014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1130/2020.2547(01)
DO - 10.1130/2020.2547(01)
M3 - Chapter
T3 - Special Paper of the Geological Society of America
BT - Special Paper of the Geological Society of America
PB - Geological Society of America
ER -