TY - JOUR
T1 - Study of a two species microbial community by an inferential comparative genomic analysis tool
T2 - Spatial Analytical Microbial Imaging
AU - Zhang, Pei
AU - Valverde, Paloma
AU - Daniel, Douglas
AU - Fox, Peter
N1 - Funding Information: This study was partially funded by Edson Grant of Arizona State University . Software development is funded by BioEchem.com . Authors thank Dr. Neal Woodbury at the Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University for the support from him and his laboratory. Author thanks Kevin Frei for his help in getting the initial grant. Publisher Copyright: © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2015/7/25
Y1 - 2015/7/25
N2 - Most molecular fingerprinting techniques, including denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) [1], comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) [2], real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) [3], destroy community structure and/or cellular integrity, therefore lost the info. of the spatial locus and the in situ genomic copy number of the cells. An alternative technique, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) doesn't require sample disintegration but needs to develop specific markers and doesn't provide info. related to genomic copy number. Here, a microbial analysis tool, Spatial Analytical Microbial Imaging (SAMI), is described. An application was performed with a mixture of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 and E. coli K-12 MG1655. The intrinsic property of their genome, reflected by the average fluorescence intensity (AFI), distinguished them in 3D. And their growth rates were inferred by comparing the total genomic fluorescence binding area (GFA) with that of the pure culture standards. A 93% of accuracy in differentiating the species was achieved. SAMI does not require sample disintegration and preserves the community spatial structure.It measures the 3D locus of cells within the mixture and may differentiate them according to the property of their genome.It allows assessment of the growth rate of the cells within the mixture by comparing their genomic copy number with that of the pure culture standards.
AB - Most molecular fingerprinting techniques, including denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) [1], comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) [2], real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) [3], destroy community structure and/or cellular integrity, therefore lost the info. of the spatial locus and the in situ genomic copy number of the cells. An alternative technique, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) doesn't require sample disintegration but needs to develop specific markers and doesn't provide info. related to genomic copy number. Here, a microbial analysis tool, Spatial Analytical Microbial Imaging (SAMI), is described. An application was performed with a mixture of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 and E. coli K-12 MG1655. The intrinsic property of their genome, reflected by the average fluorescence intensity (AFI), distinguished them in 3D. And their growth rates were inferred by comparing the total genomic fluorescence binding area (GFA) with that of the pure culture standards. A 93% of accuracy in differentiating the species was achieved. SAMI does not require sample disintegration and preserves the community spatial structure.It measures the 3D locus of cells within the mixture and may differentiate them according to the property of their genome.It allows assessment of the growth rate of the cells within the mixture by comparing their genomic copy number with that of the pure culture standards.
KW - Methods name Spatial Analytical Microbial Imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937802096&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937802096&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mex.2015.06.004
DO - 10.1016/j.mex.2015.06.004
M3 - Article
SN - 2215-0161
VL - 2
SP - 331
EP - 339
JO - MethodsX
JF - MethodsX
ER -