TY - JOUR
T1 - Teaching Ethnographic Methods
T2 - The State of the Art
AU - Ruth, Alissa
AU - Mayfour, Katherine
AU - Hardin, Jessica
AU - Sangaramoorthy, Thurka
AU - Wutich, Amber
AU - Bernard, H. Russell
AU - Beresford, Melissa
AU - SturtzSreetharan, Cindi
AU - Brayboy, Bryan Mc Kinley Jones
AU - Dengah, H. J.François
AU - Gravlee, Clarence C.
AU - Guest, Greg
AU - Harper, Krista
AU - Mahdavi, Pardis
AU - Mattison, Siobhán M.
AU - Moritz, Mark
AU - Negrón, Rosalyn
AU - Piperata, Barbara A.
AU - Snodgrass, Jeffrey G.
AU - Zarger, Rebecca
N1 - Funding Information: We acknowledge the United States National Science Foundation Cultural Anthropology Program grant (Award SBE-2017491) to the NSF Cultural Anthropology Methods Program. This material is based upon work supported by (while serving at) the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2022 by the Society for Applied Anthropology.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Ethnography is a core methodology in anthropology and other disciplines. Yet, there is currently no scholarly consensus on how to teach ethnographic methods—or even what methods belong in the ethnographic toolkit. We report on a systematic analysis of syllabi to gauge how ethnographic methods are taught in the United States. We analyze 107 methods syllabi from a nationally elicited sample of university faculty who teach ethnography. Systematic coding shows that ethics, research design, participant observation, interviewing, and analysis are central to ethnographic instruction. But many key components of ethical, quality ethnographic practice (like preparing an IRB application, reflexivity, positionality, taking field notes, accurate transcription, theme identification, and coding) are only taught rarely. We suggest that, without inclusion of such elements in its basic training, the fields that prioritize this methodology are at risk of inadvertently perpetuating uneven, erratic, and extractive fieldwork practices.
AB - Ethnography is a core methodology in anthropology and other disciplines. Yet, there is currently no scholarly consensus on how to teach ethnographic methods—or even what methods belong in the ethnographic toolkit. We report on a systematic analysis of syllabi to gauge how ethnographic methods are taught in the United States. We analyze 107 methods syllabi from a nationally elicited sample of university faculty who teach ethnography. Systematic coding shows that ethics, research design, participant observation, interviewing, and analysis are central to ethnographic instruction. But many key components of ethical, quality ethnographic practice (like preparing an IRB application, reflexivity, positionality, taking field notes, accurate transcription, theme identification, and coding) are only taught rarely. We suggest that, without inclusion of such elements in its basic training, the fields that prioritize this methodology are at risk of inadvertently perpetuating uneven, erratic, and extractive fieldwork practices.
KW - ethnography
KW - fieldwork
KW - participant observation
KW - qualitative research
KW - research methods
KW - teaching
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146524898&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146524898&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.17730/1938-3525-81.4.401
DO - 10.17730/1938-3525-81.4.401
M3 - Article
SN - 0018-7259
VL - 81
SP - 401
EP - 412
JO - Human organization
JF - Human organization
IS - 4
ER -