Abstract
This research examines the influence of temporal framing (long-term vs. short-term) and individual difference in consideration of future consequences (CFC) on the effectiveness of cigarette health warnings among smokers and at-risk nonsmokers in a college population. An online experiment (N = 395) revealed a three-way interaction among temporal framing, CFC, and smoking status. The results among at-risk nonsmokers supported the temporal fit hypothesis—those high in CFC responded more favorably to long-term framing, whereas those low in CFC responded more positively to short-term framing. The findings among smokers revealed a different pattern in which short-term framing was more effective among high-CFC smokers, whereas among low-CFC smokers the framing effect was not distinct. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 175-185 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Health Communication |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 1 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science)
- Communication
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Temporal Framing and Consideration of Future Consequences: Effects on Smokers’ and At-Risk Nonsmokers’ Responses to Cigarette Health Warnings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS