TY - JOUR
T1 - The behavioral ecology of nectar robbing
T2 - why be tactic constant?
AU - Bronstein, Judith L.
AU - Barker, Jessica L.
AU - Lichtenberg, Elinor M.
AU - Richardson, Leif L.
AU - Irwin, Rebecca E.
N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by grants from the United States National Science Foundation (DEB-1354061/1641243 to R.E. Irwin and DEB-1354155 to J.L. Bronstein) and Department of Agriculture (Grant 11588247 to L.L. Richardson). J.L. Barker was supported by the Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies Marie Curie COFUND Fellowship. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Publisher Copyright: © 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - How do animals forage for variable food resources? For animals foraging at flowers, floral constancy has provided a framework for understanding why organisms visit some flowers while bypassing others. We extend this framework to the flower-handling tactics that visitors employ. Nectar robbers remove nectar through holes bitten in flowers, often without pollinating. Many foragers can switch between robbing and visiting flowers legitimately to gain access to nectar. We document that even though individuals can switch foraging tactics, they often do not. We explore whether individuals exhibit constancy to either robbing or visiting legitimately, which we term tactic constancy. We then extend hypotheses of floral constancy to understand when and why visitors exhibit tactic constancy and raise questions for future research.
AB - How do animals forage for variable food resources? For animals foraging at flowers, floral constancy has provided a framework for understanding why organisms visit some flowers while bypassing others. We extend this framework to the flower-handling tactics that visitors employ. Nectar robbers remove nectar through holes bitten in flowers, often without pollinating. Many foragers can switch between robbing and visiting flowers legitimately to gain access to nectar. We document that even though individuals can switch foraging tactics, they often do not. We explore whether individuals exhibit constancy to either robbing or visiting legitimately, which we term tactic constancy. We then extend hypotheses of floral constancy to understand when and why visitors exhibit tactic constancy and raise questions for future research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020026571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020026571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cois.2017.05.013
DO - 10.1016/j.cois.2017.05.013
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28822483
SN - 2214-5745
VL - 21
SP - 14
EP - 18
JO - Current Opinion in Insect Science
JF - Current Opinion in Insect Science
ER -