Abstract
This research tested whether support for the killing of animals serves a terror management function. In five studies, death primes caused participants to support the killing of animals more than control primes, unless the participants’ self-esteem had been elevated (Study 4). This effect was not moderated by gender, preexisting attitudes toward killing animals or animal rights, perceived human–animal similarity, religiosity, political orientation, or by the degree to which the killing was justified. Support for killing animals after subliminal death primes was also associated with an increased sense of power and invulnerability (Study 5). Implications and future directions are discussed.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 743-757 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Personality and social psychology bulletin |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2017 |
Keywords
- genocide
- human–animal relations
- terror management
- violence
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology