The foundress's dilemma: Group selection for cooperation among queens of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus

Zachary Shaffer, Takao Sasaki, Brian Haney, Marcus Janssen, Stephen Pratt, Jennifer Fewell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

The evolution of cooperation is a fundamental problem in biology, especially for non-relatives, where indirect fitness benefits cannot counter within-group inequalities. Multilevel selection models show how cooperation can evolve if it generates a group-level advantage, even when cooperators are disadvantaged within their group. This allows the possibility of group selection, but few examples have been described in nature. Here we show that group selection can explain the evolution of cooperative nest founding in the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus. Through most of this species' range, colonies are founded by single queens, but in some populations nests are instead founded by cooperative groups of unrelated queens. In mixed groups of cooperative and single-founding queens, we found that aggressive individuals had a survival advantage within their nest, but foundress groups with such non-cooperators died out more often than those with only cooperative members. An agent-based model shows that the between-group advantage of the cooperative phenotype drives it to fixation, despite its within-group disadvantage, but only when population density is high enough to make between-group competition intense. Field data show higher nest density in a population where cooperative founding is common, consistent with greater density driving the evolution of cooperative foundation through group selection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number29828
JournalScientific reports
Volume6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 28 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The foundress's dilemma: Group selection for cooperation among queens of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this