Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

THE TENURED FACULTY PERSPECTIVE

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Tenure is often seen as the Holy Grail-the pinnacle of an academic career that gives someone license to say and do almost anything within the academy. However, things are never quite as they seem. The spoiler alert here is what tenure doesn’t do: supersede deeply ingrained biases that people have when looking at or interacting with someone. Therefore, classism is still present, along with other isms, no matter how much or how long you have proven yourself worthy to be in higher education. Yes, even among the tenured and emeritus (i.e., honored folks who retain influence and privileges on retirement) faculty, social class influences how they are allowed to engage with and challenge the academy. In this chapter, we will learn more about negotiating social class identity from three faculty members who represent the three points beyond tenure-associ-ate professor, full professor, and professor emeritus-through the stories of Nancy J. Evans, professor emerita at Iowa State University; Rudy P. Guevarra Jr., associate professor at Arizona State University; and Larry D. Roper, professor at Oregon State University.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationStraddling Class in the Academy
Subtitle of host publication26 Stories of Students, Administrators, and Faculty From Poor and Working-Class Backgrounds and Their Compelling Lessons for Higher Education Policy and Practice
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages129-145
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9781000976618
ISBN (Print)9781620367391
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'THE TENURED FACULTY PERSPECTIVE'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this