Abstract
Tenure is often seen as the Holy Grail-the pinnacle of an academic career that gives someone license to say and do almost anything within the academy. However, things are never quite as they seem. The spoiler alert here is what tenure doesn’t do: supersede deeply ingrained biases that people have when looking at or interacting with someone. Therefore, classism is still present, along with other isms, no matter how much or how long you have proven yourself worthy to be in higher education. Yes, even among the tenured and emeritus (i.e., honored folks who retain influence and privileges on retirement) faculty, social class influences how they are allowed to engage with and challenge the academy. In this chapter, we will learn more about negotiating social class identity from three faculty members who represent the three points beyond tenure-associ-ate professor, full professor, and professor emeritus-through the stories of Nancy J. Evans, professor emerita at Iowa State University; Rudy P. Guevarra Jr., associate professor at Arizona State University; and Larry D. Roper, professor at Oregon State University.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Straddling Class in the Academy |
| Subtitle of host publication | 26 Stories of Students, Administrators, and Faculty From Poor and Working-Class Backgrounds and Their Compelling Lessons for Higher Education Policy and Practice |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| Pages | 129-145 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781000976618 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781620367391 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2023 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'THE TENURED FACULTY PERSPECTIVE'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS