TY - JOUR
T1 - Transgender Graduate Students
T2 - Considerations, Tensions, and Decisions in Choosing a Graduate Program
AU - Goldberg, Abbie E.
AU - McCormick, Nora
AU - Matsuno, Em
AU - Virginia, Haylie
AU - Beemyn, Genny
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This study explored how 30 trans graduate students made decisions regarding graduate school. Specifically, it examined how the students chose their graduate program and, secondarily, how they chose their field, what led them to apply to graduate school, and their outness during the application process. In selecting a program, participants considered contextual and personal factors that encompassed commonly cited academic and pragmatic circumstances (e.g., reputation; cost) and factors salient to their gender identity, including state and university climate. Participants identified a number of tensions in choosing a program (e.g., whether to prioritize academic factors over program climate)—although some could not prioritize program climate because their field (e.g., STEM) was not LGBTQ savvy. In applying to graduate school, participants weighed the benefits of being out as trans (e.g., authenticity; finding a “good fit”) and risks (e.g., discrimination). Findings have implications for higher education administrators, career counselors, clinicians, and researchers.
AB - This study explored how 30 trans graduate students made decisions regarding graduate school. Specifically, it examined how the students chose their graduate program and, secondarily, how they chose their field, what led them to apply to graduate school, and their outness during the application process. In selecting a program, participants considered contextual and personal factors that encompassed commonly cited academic and pragmatic circumstances (e.g., reputation; cost) and factors salient to their gender identity, including state and university climate. Participants identified a number of tensions in choosing a program (e.g., whether to prioritize academic factors over program climate)—although some could not prioritize program climate because their field (e.g., STEM) was not LGBTQ savvy. In applying to graduate school, participants weighed the benefits of being out as trans (e.g., authenticity; finding a “good fit”) and risks (e.g., discrimination). Findings have implications for higher education administrators, career counselors, clinicians, and researchers.
KW - Graduate school
KW - decision-making
KW - graduate student
KW - higher education
KW - nonbinary
KW - trans
KW - transgender
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105128251&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105128251&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00918369.2021.1919476
DO - 10.1080/00918369.2021.1919476
M3 - Article
C2 - 33900153
SN - 0091-8369
VL - 69
SP - 1549
EP - 1575
JO - Journal of Homosexuality
JF - Journal of Homosexuality
IS - 9
ER -