Abstract
This article takes up Fodor and Lepore's (1998) account of the meaning of [want DP] structures, according to which the verb to have is introduced at interpretation. With certain DP complements a want to have DP paraphrase of want DP is ill formed; the correct paraphrase uses get or give. To allow for this, F&L would have to vary the introduced verb depending on the meaning of the DP, but this would make their proposal "co-compositional," defeating its original purpose. If have, get, and give all contain the abstract preposition P HAVE (Harley 1995, Richards 2001), however, F&L's treatment may be appropriately revised: the element introduced by want is not have but P HAVE. F&L can avoid co-compositionality at the price of allowing lexical decomposition.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 255-267 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Linguistic Inquiry |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2004 |
Keywords
- Atomism
- Compositionality
- Have
- Idiom
- Lexical decomposition
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Wanting, having, and getting: A note on Fodor and Lepore 1998'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS