WHY DO FEWER WOMEN THAN MEN APPLY for GRANTS after THEIR PHDS?

Lynne Goldstein, Barbara J. Mills, Sarah Herr, Jo Ellen Burkholder, Leslie Aiello, Christopher Thornton

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

In spring 2013, the Society for American Archaeology created the Task Force on Gender Disparities in Archaeological Grant Submissions because of an apparent disparity in the rates of senior (post-PhD) proposal submissions by men and women to archaeology programs at the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. Although NSF success rates for men and women between 2009 and 2013 were roughly equal, the number of senior women archaeology submissions was half that of men. Given the documented increase in the proportion of women in academic archaeology, this representation of women seemed low. Moreover, submissions for NSF doctoral dissertation improvement grants were evenly divided between men and women. Statistics for Wenner-Gren noted the same general disparity in archaeology. This study examines and integrates a variety of data sources, including interviews with post-PhD women, to determine whether or not there is a problem in research grant submissions. Although the results indicate that there is a problem, it is multifaceted. Women are not well represented at research-intensive universities, and some women instead practice what we term scaffolding to integrate smaller pots of money to accomplish their research. Recommendations are provided for female applicants, academic departments, the Society for American Archaeology, and granting agencies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-386
Number of pages20
JournalAmerican Antiquity
Volume83
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Archaeology
  • Museology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'WHY DO FEWER WOMEN THAN MEN APPLY for GRANTS after THEIR PHDS?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this